Pages

Pages

Contact Us. By E-mail: anandamargauniversal@earthlink.net

Saturday, September 13, 2025

News: trying to unite AMPS via the court

Baba

News: trying to unite AMPS via the court

~ The below is courtesy of WhatsApp forums ~

Today on 12th September, around 11 am to 11:30, in the case of title suit 305/2003 governing body, 2 senior WT workers and 2 senior Grihi Margi together filed an Intervention Implementation Application in the case. It has about 12 points.Kolkata's governing body has been challenged by calling it an illegal governing body and Ranchi's Purodha Pramukh as an illegal Purodha. And the application file will be accepted on the next date. Today, our application has also been served to both groups in the court. Both groups will respond to that application on the next date. ðŸ”¥ 

Regarding intervention🔥 After discussing with legal experts, it has come to the conclusion that the application submitted in the court by Dada Mantra Chetanananda Avdhoot and his other colleagues is actually an Intervention / Implementation Application given under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC and Section 151 CPC. This simply means that: ðŸ‘‰ In the original case (Title Suit No. 305 of 2003), there is a dispute going on between the Plaintiff (Ananda Marga Pracharak Sangha and others) and the Defendant (Acarya Raghunath Prasad and others). 

 ðŸ‘‰ Now the third party (Acharya Mantrachetnanand ji and other members) is requesting the court to add them as Defendants in this case, so that their side can also be heard and the real dispute can be resolved. In simple language: This is not a separate case, but a demand for entry in the same ongoing case by saying *"We are also affected, we should also be heard"*. This is called Intervention / Implementation Petition. ⚖️*When can the court agree❓*⚖️ ★If the interest of these new applicants is directly affected. ★If they prove that “proper and complete settlement” of the case is not possible without hearing them. ⚖️ *When can the court dismiss ❓*⚖️ ★If their interest is very indirect. ★If their purpose is only to prolong the case. ★If the court believes that their rights are already protected and a separate case can be filed.
 
👉 Acarya Mantrachetnanand ji must have told the court that: ★They are members of Anand Marg. ★Both the Plaintiffs and Defendants groups are “violating the rules of the organization”. ★They have the correct interpretation of the original Constitution/Bylaws (1981) and Karyacarya. ★If they are not heard, the rights of the rest of the members (who are not in any group) will be affected. Therefore, he has requested the court to add him as a Defendant in this case. 

[13/09, 7:15 am] MC Anand: The entire team of Inter Bin Case has no connection with any group or GCU. We have started this team on an individual basis. Earlier, we tried to get everyone to work together to do this work. But when it was seen that most of the people are ready to give moral support. But when it comes to tying a bell around their neck, those people do not come forward openly due to their personal reasons or family problems. Then for about a year, such people were searched who would be ready to tie a bell around their neck. Then their team was formed, and after working day and night on this legal work, the team got success. Nothing remains hidden. When the time comes, the team members will also be made open. 

[13/09, 7:15 am] MC Anand: Dada Arpitananda ji, Mantrachetanand is just a puppet of Baba. Mantrachetanand is dancing like a puppet the way Baba would make his puppet dance. There is a team of 7/8 advocates to do this work. In which 3 are non Margi advocates. Rest all are Margi brother advocates. Apart from these advocates, guidance of many senior WT workers is also included. All of them have been giving their full contribution according to their capacity since the last few months. Such a big work cannot be done without a team. If you want to thank, then thank the whole team and encourage their morale. Help me to protect me from falling down of my spiritual progress by knowingly or unknowingly creating ego in me by giving credit only to me for this work. 

[13/09, 7:15 am] MC Anand: *Special notice* It was known through reliable sources that a meeting was held in Anand Nagar on 6/7 September 2025 under the Global Meet. A delegation of their Grahi Margis met DM Purulia on 8 September in the afternoon and put forward their demands through a memorandum. The first delegation met DM Purulia. So DM Purulia said that in this regard you people (delegation) should meet ADM Purulia, he takes care of everything, I (DM Purulia) will also call him (ADM Purulia). After that the delegation met ADM Purulia.

===

The delegation had a special demand. Anand Marg Pracharak Sangh was that Shri Shri Anandmurti Ji always used to do New Year DMC on 30/31 December and 1 January. But now, due to Anand Marg Pracharak Sangh being divided into Kolkata Group and Ranchi Group, Anand Marg Pracharak Sangh's New Year DMS is not happening on 30/31 December and 1 January. Therefore, all Anand Margis are facing a lot of trouble. If you (ADM Purulia) will give the date of DMS to be held in Anand Marg New Year as 30/31 December and 1 January, then it will be a great favor from you. We all Anand Margis want *"One AMPS One DMS"*.

ADM Purulia also put forward his point to the delegation. He said that:-

1) If you want that there should be *"One AMPS One DMS"*, then you people (delegation) bring the order from the court. We (ADM Administration) will implement that court order. Without a court order, it will be impossible for us (ADM administration) to get "one AMPS one DMS" done.

2) Because Anand Marg has got the status of a religious institution from the Supreme Court. Due to the status of a religious institution, we cannot stop anyone from worshipping their deity or doing a program according to their faith. The way we (Purulia administration) give the date of DMS to Kolkata group and Ranchi group, in the same way if you people (Pratinidhi Mandal) also ask for a date to do your DMS, then Purulia administration will also give you the date of DMS.

3) If you (Pratinidhi Mandal) want that Anand Marg Pracharak Sangh should have *"one AMPS one DMS"*, without a court order, it will not be possible to give the date of New Year *"one AMPS one DMS"* of 30/31 December and 1 January for Anand Nagar.

(The above description is in the form of a summary. I have put before you only the information I got. If you want to get complete information, you can get it from the members of the delegation.)

Acarya Mantracetanananda Avdhuta

~ The above is courtesy of WhatsApp forums ~


== Section 2: Links ==

Dogma of Mahaprayan - 21 Oct 
Contravening Baba
MPD wailing
Annual death day dogma

MPD obsolete

Mahaprayan: a relic of Islam
MPD against spirituality
Bhakti: what to remember

Other News Bulletin Topics  

Misguided avadhuta harming girls
History of AMPS: rise & fall