Baba
Thief avadhuta - 2
Note: This letter is only for those who have reverence for Guru and try to follow His guideline.
Namaskar,
Here is an utterly shocking display of what one avadhuta has done in the newspaper.
1. One avadhuta has stolen Baba’s discourse, published in the newspaper, and signed his own avadhuta name at the end, as if he is the author. This is a clear-cut case of theft. See how he has signed his name in the lower right corner of the article.
2. Dadaji has also included Baba’s photo in the article. Yet this goes against the sanctity of Ista and sanctity of Guru’s pratikrti.
Ananda Marga Caryacarya states: “You shall protect, in all respects and at all costs, the dignity of your treasures and the sanctity of your flag, of your emblem, and of the pratikrti [photo] of Márga Guru.” (1)
In the below image, see how he has signed his name in the lower right corner of the article. Also see also how we have removed Baba's photo to protect the sanctity of Guru. But in the newspaper the photo was included in the space. This sin was done by avadhuta Dada DC, whose name you will see later on in this letter.
3. Yet everyone knows that newspapers in India are used as diapers when little kids pass stool, diarrhea, dysentery in their pants; and newspapers are used by poor and homeless people who stuff it inside their underwear to soak up the dripping urine / incontinence etc.
Indeed Dada Divyacetanananda is the one who has committed this sin. And this is not the first time. He is a repeat offender and each time he has been warned but this Dada is so thick-skinned and morally bankrupt that he does the same wrong again and again. We urge you to write Dadaji and plead with him to stop this.
4. For more information about this, kindly read these below letters:
Avt committed three sins
Unfortunately we have seen all kinds of avadhutas from saintly people to criminals and thieves. So, watch out-- may Parama Purusa save us from these types of muggers & thieves.
The avadhuta dada who has printed this Baba's photo and Baba’s discourse in the newspaper, has committed three sins--
Sin # 1) Lack of proper citation, i.e. date, place, book-- this is all absent. So this creates one negative trend. It opens the door for false things to get printed in Baba's name. And It thereby opens the door for adulteration in Baba's teachings. History bears testimony that the thinking of various social thinkers, spiritual leaders, Mahasambhutis has been polluted and destroyed in this way.
Sin # 2) In the article look over to the right-most column, and see at the end of that column is Divyacetanananda’s name. The way this is printed gives the reader the false notion that the author of the article is Divyacetananada (DC). DC is a thief. Internally Divyacetananada wants this, that people should think he is the writer. That is why he presented it in this way to the newspaper. This is a sign of the narcissism of Divyacetanananda. He wants to glorify himself more than he wants to propagate Baba. It is just like when tourists go to certain historical sites, then they take their own selfie photo. Their goal is to project themselves on the launchpad of those statues etc. Similarly, in the name of Baba's discourses, Divyacetanananda wants to highlight himself. If any avadhuta has this type of feeling, that is a degraded avadhuta. Because a true avadhuta is not a thief; the true avadhuta glorifies his Guru's image, and not himself.
Newspaper is used in India as the poor people's diaper
Sin # 3) The newspaper is used in India as the poor people's diaper. For more details about a similar event, please click on the below link.
For the above reason, printing Baba's photo in the newspaper is a gross violation of Baba's below teaching in Caryacarya.
Ananda Marga Caryacarya states, “You shall protect, in all respects and at all costs, the dignity of your treasures and the sanctity of your flag, of your emblem, and of the pratikrti [photo] of Márga Guru.” (2)
In the below image of the newspaper article, please note that all of the text is straight from a discourse given by Baba. There is not a single line written by dada Divyacetanananda. Yet nowhere in this article is there any indication provided that the text is Baba's discourse. This proves conclusively that Divyacetanananda is a thief.
In any newspaper the following standards are maintained.
Many deplorable deeds of so called monk
1. In a standard newspaper article, when providing the text of someone else's discourse there must be a sentence stating, "Following is the text of a discourse given by Shrii Shrii Anandamurti ji." But such an introduction is below conspicuously absent. So Divyacetanananda is a thief.
2. It is standard to inform the reader that Shrii Shrii Anandamurti ji has given the discourse on such a date, in such a place, and that it is printed in such a book. This is also absent. So Divyachetanananda is a thief.
3. It is standard to place the words of another individual in quote marks. Failure to do so marks the article as plagiarism, which is a very serious offence. In this newspaper article there are no quote marks at the beginning or end of the article. So Divyacetanananda is a thief.
In the below article there are simply three columns of Baba’s unquoted discourse text, with Divyachetanananda’s name at the end. It is astonishing when one realizes he is taking personal credit for Baba's discourse.
That Baba's photo appears here does nothing to explain who is the author of the text; indeed as mentioned above (1) It is common to place the photo of one who is being written about; (2) It is highly objectionable that Baba's photo appears in a newspaper which is to be used for all manner of mundane activities such as eating food on etc, and then thrown in the street to be defecated on by animals.
Namaskar,
In Him,
Krishná Banerjee
Where he stole it from
This avadhuta stole from Subhasita Samgraha part-23, chapter 3 (Hindi) p. 43 last line to p. 44 almost to last paragraph. Dadaji cut a section from the discourse and published it in the newspaper. And he failed to indicated that this was just a section from a greater discourse. By this way, readers will be led astray in multiple ways. Namely, this will think this article is complete unto itself. But that is not the case. Dadaji ripped this small portion out from the original discourse. This way he distorted the fact.
The name of the discourse is Manavatva Aor Devatva. Dadaji is so devious that he removed all Sanskrit shlokas and other poems that Baba referred. And he did this with the purpose to belittle Baba. This newspaper article was printed in Hindi and any dharmic article is respected more if it has Sanskrit shlokas. Then people form a positive opinion that it is supported by the sages. Due to his dirty mindset, Dada removed those intentionally. You can go and confirm by this book SS-part 23-3 (Hindi Edition) p.43, last line to p. 44 almost to the last paragraph. And the name of the discourse is Manavatva Aor Devatva.
Note 1: If you would like to receive the newspaper article in larger font, let us know.
Note 2: Sometimes the word ‘thief’ is used in the sense of one who plagiarizes. Because some non-English readers may not have familiarity with the term ‘plagiarize’, so the common term ‘thief’ has been used.
Only great bhaktas can understand
This avadhuta is announcing the death day anniversary (so-called mahaprayan) of Baba as 21st Oct. We know that Baba is the ever-present Sadguru yet here on a massive public platform this avadhuta is declaring to the world that this is Baba’s death day. If a non-margii writes like this what can we say as they do not do sadhana. But here we are talking about one of our prestigious avadhutas who knows very well that Baba is his Guru and he preaches to other sadhakas also that Baba is watching. But in his hypocrisy this avadhuta is declaring that 21 Oct is the Death day. This is preposterous and unfortunate.
Who did this
So this is just one thief and lowly avadhuta who has done this. Everyone is hereby requested to write to Dada Divyacetanananda about this:
References
1. "Treasures of Ananda Marga," Ananda Marga Caryácarya Part 1
2. "Treasures of Ananda Marga," Ananda Marga Caryácarya Part 1
Divyacetanananda, Divyachetanananda
== Section 2:
Comment ==
Re: In WhatsApp: false propaganda in the name of Baba
Namaskar to all,
i want to say to Respected Arun Aggrawal ji,
we all are members of my beloved BABA's Universal family. No one is inferior or superior.
Ananda Marga ideology is exceptional because of practical approach of Universal Brotherhood. And reflects the idea of "Vasudhaev Kutumbakam".
If anything happening wrong ideologically, its our duty to inspire anyone or everyone and take measure ideologically without hatred and prejudice.
In this spiritual path everyone has right to love BABA and serve the humanity. Let's no one lags behind. No one feel inferior.
अपनों की बुराइयों की चर्चा करने में इतने मश़गूल हो गए के अपने ही बुरे
बन गये. अपने आप को ही पराया बना दिया.
अगर सचमुच आप एक तटस्थ उदाहरण पेश करना चाहते हैं की आनंद मार्ग के
कार्यकतां कैसे हों तो अपने को या घर में बेटा, बेटी, बहन, भाई को
whole timer बनने के लिए प्रोत्साहन करें ।
Let's begin charity from home.
Action speaks more than words.
with regards
Acharya Premendrananda Avadhuta
Here is a link to the initial letter on this topic: In Whatsapp: false propaganda in the name of Baba
== Section 3:
Links ==
Recent postings
Other topics of interest
~ Legal Notice ~
© 2016 Ananda Marga News Bulletin. All rights reserved. Ananda Marga News Bulletin content is the intellectual property of Ananda Marga News Bulletin or its third party content providers. Ananda Marga News Bulletin shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Any copying, republication or redistribution, part or full, of Ananda Marga News Bulletin content, including by framing or similar means, is against the court of law and expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Ananda Marga News Bulletin.
This email contains three sections:
3. Links
