Communists in the guise of Prout leader + 3 more

Baba

Communists in the guise of Prout leader

Namaskar,

Here are a few examples of how our Prout movement is being devoured by a few tried and true communists. After reviewing the situation, clear interventions should be taken as per the proper measures.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com/


Example #1: Communists infiltrating Prout

Some Prout leaders are propagating rotten, outdated, communist ideas. One Prout rally raised the slogan: “Demand land for the landless.” This is a communist strategy. This type of demand is not Proutistic. Shrii Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar, the Propounder of Prout, outrightly rejects this communist approach. For more about this, please see the appended section of Prout discourse titled, "The Defects of Distributing Plots of Land".

According to Prout, land is not the antidote. Landless and impoverished people do not need land; they need jobs. Land will not help them. This slogan - “Land for the landless” - is an outdated communist idea. Those who are true Proutists should be very alert. Sadly, our Prout movement has been hijacked and infiltrated by communist people. In the first phase we should identify those so-called Proutists who do not want to give up their communist-minded ideas, despite repeated warnings. 
 
In one newsletter, a Dada is leading a Prout gathering in Odisha where many are raising the Prout flag and demanding land for the landless. This is a delusional communist idea and has no place in a Prout rally. Yet sadly, it is being highlighted and glorified in a Prout Newsletter from the PU Global Office. For the Proutistic teaching on this please see reference #1. 

Verily, this is a typical communist slogan to demand land for the landless. Yet sadly, it is being highlighted and glorified in a Prout Newsletter from the PU Global Office. Tragically, this is part of an ongoing trend where some, operating in the name of Prout, openly propagate communist ideas and organise rallies in favour of communists. We have to first identify such persons and pressure them to change their ways.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com/


Conclusion

Our Prout movement should be the medium for propagating the ideals and aims of Prout, not communism. For that study is essential. The notion of using Prout to promote antiquated, communist ideas is suicidal. Shrii Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar’s teachings on Prout are wholly unique, and it is our duty to present those teachings to the public in an untainted and clear manner. We should not allow the platform of Prout to be hijacked by communists in the garb of Proutists. Now is the time to unmask the hypocrisy of a few bad apples who preach communism in the guise of Prout. 
 
Namaskar, 
Jinanadeva
(Jonathan Archer)

~ In-depth study ~

Propagating communism under the banner of Prout

In the second phase, we should alert everybody to study Prout and force those who are communists in their heart from using the banner of Prout. One avadhuta is at the forefront of the communist theory and that is Maheshvarananda. In spite of repeated warnings and requests Maheshvarananda does not want to give up communist ideas, rather he preaches communism in the name of Prout.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com/

Verily, there are many instances of this but here is one anecdotal example. Maheshvarananda appreciates how the communist government of Cuba relies upon human trafficking, and he has written in favour of human trafficking in his book. Maheshvarananda instead calls it human bartering. That is how he describes communist Cuba’s inhumane way of trading human beings in exchange for petroleum from Venezuela etc. But that is not Proutistic. Prout does not view humans as commodities that can be bought, sold, and traded against their will in the marketplace. That is a communist notion. For more details about this click here:

• Wt supports human trafficking

Example #2: communists infiltrating Prout

The Prout Delhi magazine is the mouthpiece of Prout philosophy. But in fact it is nothing but a collection of articles from communist websites. Those leftist articles are pasted here in the Delhi Prout magazine and given the external facade of Prout. 

It is like jackals arriving in a lion’s coat. The Delhi Prout magazine is communist portal in the name of Prout. They sprinkle a few quotes to befool margii readers that it is a Prout magazine. But all of the articles of substance are mostly communist in nature. 

• http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com/2015/08/example-delhi-prout-mag-has-become.html

Prout teaching on this very vital issue

Here is the section from the Prout discourse (Agrarian Revolution) that condemns the communist approach of giving land to the landless. 

The Defects of Distributing Plots of Land

Prout philosophy states, “Another political group [communists] in India wants to bring about radical changes in the economic sphere by transferring all power to the masses. According to them every citizen should own a certain portion of land – no one should remain landless. Poor people are easily won over by these sentiments. Politicians espouse these ideas merely to lure people so that they can fulfil their own political aspirations. Poor landless peasants become overjoyed at the prospect of owning their own land, then politicians use them to achieve their objectives.”

“A particular political party today advocates forcibly depriving landowners of their land and distributing it to the landless peasants. By creating a rift between the landowners and agricultural workers, these politicians try to cultivate a philanthropic image.”

“Let us analyse to what extent this approach would be conducive to the overall economic growth of India. First, if surplus land were distributed among landless people, no one would get more than an acre of land at the most. This acre of land would not be an ideal economic holding because it could not be cultivated with the latest scientific methods. A sizeable portion of the land would be wasted in demarcating boundary lines, so it would be impossible to increase productivity. Increased productivity is the most important agricultural requirement in India today. Besides this, if land were distributed in this way, land would be further subdivided with the increase in the population, further aggravating the problem.” (1)

If you want to read the edition of the “Prout News & Analysis” publication from the Global Office then let us know and we will send it to you.

Main culprits publishing communist land propaganda in name of Prout

Please awaken this blind fake Proutist. Open his eyes that he should stop propagating dead communist ideas in the name of Prout. 

• Ac. Ambareshvarananda Avt. is the fake Proutist and publisher of the magazine “Prout News & Analysis”. But what a joke and laughing stock his magazine is. What to speak of analysing and presenting Prout, he is the agent of communism. It is just a mockery.

Kindly contact Dada Ambareshvarananda and open his eyes:
Email: contact@prout-global.org 

Or you may write Dada at this address: Platanvej 30, Fredriksberg C, Copenhagen 1810, Denmark

Odisha Prout rally organisers: They also need their eyes opened. That rally in Odisha that hailed communist ideas about the landless is completely wrong. If they want to have a Prout rally then they should first consult someone who knows about Prout to make sure that their idea is valid and not some bogus, communist notion. 
https://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com/

Prout teaching on this very vital issue (Full)

Prout philosophy states, “Another political group [communists] in India wants to bring about radical changes in the economic sphere by transferring all power to the masses. According to them every citizen should own a certain portion of land – no one should remain landless. Poor people are easily won over by these sentiments. Politicians espouse these ideas merely to lure people so that they can fulfil their own political aspirations. Poor landless peasants become overjoyed at the prospect of owning their own land, then politicians use them to achieve their objectives."

"A particular political party today advocates forcibly depriving landowners of their land and distributing it to the landless peasants. By creating a rift between the landowners and agricultural workers, these politicians try to cultivate a philanthropic image."

“Let us analyse to what extent this approach would be conducive to the overall economic growth of India. First, if surplus land were distributed among landless people, no one would get more than an acre of land at the most. This acre of land would not be an ideal economic holding because it could not be cultivated with the latest scientific methods. A sizeable portion of the land would be wasted in demarcating boundary lines, so it would be impossible to increase productivity. Increased productivity is the most important agricultural requirement in India today. Besides this, if land were distributed in this way, land would be further subdivided with the increase in the population, further aggravating the problem.

“Secondly, this approach would have the effect of increasing the number of petit bourgeoisie. By petit bourgeoisie I mean those who derive unearned income by giving their land to others for cultivation because they are in economic difficulty. If landless peasants acquired a plot of one acre, they would certainly get some psychic satisfaction, but when they failed to earn anything after cultivating the land, they would definitely become disheartened. It would require all their time, energy and money to cultivate one acre of land productively because the land would be too small to utilize modern agricultural techniques. The amount of produce they would get in return would not be enough to maintain their families. They would have to lease a portion of the land and try to earn their income through other methods. By this process, the number of landowners would increase and they would all become part of the petit bourgeoisie. Politicians who claim that they hate landowners and raise slogans for their destruction deviate from their professed platform, because such an ideology only results in the creation of more landowners.

“Thirdly, before the redistribution of the land, these politicians forcibly occupy the land, steal the produce, set fire to the crops, and through a host of other subversive methods, instigate hostilities against the landowners. Consequently, landowners become increasingly indifferent to the agricultural production of their land as they have no economic security. When these factors are combined together, they only aggravate the agricultural problem rather than solve it.

“Thus, in order to solve the agricultural problems in India, the Chinese system, which is based on the principle that the one who works the plough should own the land, is not applicable. Rather, to solve India’s agricultural problems, there must be a radical change in the entire agricultural system.” (2)

References
1. Prout in a Nutshell - 7, Agrarian Revolution
2. Prout in a Nutshell - 7, Agrarian Revolution

Addendum

In the below newsletter, one Dada is leading a Prout gathering where many are raising the Prout flag. And in the text directly below the photo there is a line highlighted in orange: Two rallies were held in Odisha state to demand land for the landless. This is a delusional communist idea and has no place in a Prout rally. Yet sadly, it is being highlighted and glorified in a Prout Newsletter from the PU Global Office. For the Proutistic teaching on this please see reference #1.

The above line highlighted in orange is a typical communist slogan: Two rallies were held in Odisha state to demand land for the landless. Yet sadly, it is being highlighted and glorified in a Prout Newsletter from the PU Global Office. Tragically, this is part of an ongoing trend where some operating in the name of Prout openly propagating communist ideas and organising rallies in favour of communists. We have to first identify such persons and pressure them to change their ways.

Main culprits publishing communist land propaganda in name of Prout

Please awaken this blind fake Proutist. Open his eyes that he should stop propagating dead communist ideas in the name of Prout.

• Ac. Ambareshvarananda Avt. is the fake Proutist and publisher of the magazine “Prout News & Analysis”. But what a joke and laughingstock his magazine is. What to speak of analysing and presenting Prout, he is the agent of communism. It is just a mockery.

Kindly contact Dada Ambareshvarananda and open his eyes:

Email: contact@prout-global.org

Or you may write Dada at this address: Platanvej 30, Fredriksberg C, Copenhagen 1810, Denmark

• Odisha Prout rally organisers: They also need their eyes opened. That rally in Odisha that hailed communist ideas about the landless is completely wrong. If they want to have a Prout rally then they should first consult someone who knows about Prout to make sure that their idea is valid and not some bogus, communist notion.

https://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com/

*        *        *

The below sections are entirely different topics, unrelated to the above material.
They stands on their own as points of interest.

== Section 3: Comment ==

Re: Requirement for propagating Prout

Namaskar,

I could not agree more with this post and this publication.    I am living in the United States today, in serious moral decay.  The media is completely complicit, indeed creating much  of the confusion.   It takes a lot of propaganda to make people believe that it is right that only a handful of people should control nearly all the wealth, and that if you are poor it is your own fault.  It takes a lot of propaganda to make people believe that war making is 'defense', that supporting the wealthy is good for all of us, that slaughtering children at school means we need more guns.  That is what lots of people are actually saying - no kidding.     There must be more opportunities, more places for people to get their news.  Not just news, but to link the current events with the history, how it is we got here, and with a view to where we are going, what the future can become. 

   

Social media, Facebook, Google, Youtube and all the rest are corrupted now.   And so we now have an immoral clown running this country.   Nobody can talk about politics and disagree without getting into a shouting match.   So many people are so confused and there is literally nowhere to get the real story.    

Imho we desperately need media outlets, 21st Century media outlets.   Newspapers are dying, very few local newspapers remain and they do not provide investigative journalism, merely place for advertisements and puff pieces that pass as journalism.  Only the big national papers remain, most people read the newspaper on the internet, if at all.   This is the most urgent task at hand and with Baba's grace He will prevail... I don't know the future and I don't understand how we get from here to there - but the future will unfold through His will.  I believe we are blessed to be here on the planet now with the opportunity participate in His grand plan.

In Him,

Mukunda - from Oregon 

- Here is a link to the initial letter on this topic: Requirement for propagating Prout

== Section 3: Links ==

Recent postings

• Comparing oneself in negative way
  

• All can't procreate
  

• Uncivilized Wts
  

• Sin: Baba photo in newspaper
  

Other topics of interest

• Crowd & death

• Real problem in AMPS
  

• Ever-new style
  

• Altered photo ruining dhyana
  

More important letters

• Rudrananda with his main henchmen
  

• Pranavatmakananda spread false things in book
  

• Why abortion is sinful in AM

• Coward writer