Baba
Bogus way of dada
Namaskar,
As Ananda Margiis, our polestar is Parama Purusa Baba (Ista) and our guiding light is Ananda Marga ideology (adarsha). While traveling the path, His divine teachings keep us moving in the proper direction.
Sometimes, instead of looking towards His supreme guidelines by reading or listening to His direct teachings, a few are apt to refer to books written by some Dadas wherein those Wts recount their remembrances and tales of being with Baba. Unfortunately, what some Dadas recall is often inaccurate. And that can cause a lot of problems.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com
Here following is a classic case of how one Dada is making a preposterous claim against His own Guru Shrii Shrii Anandamurti ji. Dada’s proclamation is patently false and baseless. To understand the details of this matter, please read further.
What Dadaji wrote
In his book, Dada K is imagining the following scene. Pay special attention to the line in yellow.
Dada K wrote: "During the 1987 DMC at Ananda Nagar, Ac Vijayananda Avt was reading the English rendering of a Prabhat Samgiita in which there was mistake. My Master [Sadguru Baba] corrected the mistake from the dais and said, 'It is my mistake that due to lack of time I could not give the English rendering of the Prabhat Samgiita myself; otherwise, such mistakes would not have cropped up'." (From Dadaji's Storybook, p.114 - see scan appended below.)
What Dada K has written and published in his book is erroneous and completely false. All those who care about the facts know that Guru never renders the English purport of Prabhat Samgiita.
Dada’s writing: wrongful & sinful
So Dadaji’s account is factually incorrect and sinful on multiple fronts. Let’s look at them one by one:
#1: Dada wrongly claims that Baba would give the English rendering of Prabhat Samgiita. Thus, first is that Baba never writes the purport nor does He give the rendering of Prabhat Samgiita. So this accusation by Dada K is completely false.
#2: Second is that Dada K makes the accusation that Baba was begging apology for His mistake about rendering Prabhat Samgiita.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com
Hence the first point is false and on the basis of that false statement Dada built up the second point.
Conclusion
What Dada K wrote is a gross sin of the worst nature as He is accusing Guru of preposterous events that never happened. This clearly demonstrates that Dada K’s book is patently false and proves that Dada is not of the requisite standard to write a book on Guru or His teachings.
Namaskar,
in Him,
Krpasundar
~ In-depth study ~
The Dada who hallucinated and committed this sin in his book is Dada Krpananda. And the name of his book is "My Master the Supreme Guide." And it was on page p.114, pt #11 that Dada recounted this bogus scene. This book was published in 2003 and in these last 15 years this book has misled thousands and thousands of readers.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com
Madhuvratananda is also responsible because he is the pseudo-editor and publisher - so he is equally responsible for this terrible sin.
This entire topic gives the clarion call to all sincere Ananda Margiis to read Dadas’ books with "a grain of salt." One must evaluate each story for its authenticity and accuracy. Every religion in the past was ruined and / or destroyed due to the bogus stories told by the disciples. Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha should not face that fate. This clearly demonstrates that Dada K’s book is patently false and proves that Dada is not of the requisite standard to write a book on Guru or His teachings.
Guru never rendered purports
Some magiis, wts, and / or family acaryas had the duty to write purports and read them aloud in front of Baba at DMC in the pandal. Then if there was a mistake then Baba used to correct those wrongs. The central idea is that Baba never renders Prabhat Samgiita purports in any language. This can be confirmed by various recordings of DMC which are widely available. All in all Dada K’s writing is nothing but his delirium. This clearly demonstrates that Dada K’s book is patently false and proves that Dada is not of the requisite standard to write a book on Guru or His teachings.
Two very key points
Here are two truths about this matter:
(a) Sadguru Baba never commits any mistakes.
(b) Since Sadguru Baba never makes any mistake then there is no question of His issuing any apology.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com
In addition, Dada K’s description of events is wholly inaccurate and false. All in all Dada K’s writing is nothing but his delirium. This clearly demonstrates that Dada K’s book is patently false and proves that Dada is not of the requisite standard to write a book on Guru or His teachings.
Some dangerous ramifications of Dadaji’s book
(a) Dada K is opening the door wide to the notion that Guru is careless and commits mistakes due to His own ineptitude etc. Dada’s approach gives the feeling that there are so many mistakes and countless wrongs which Baba has done thus bringing all His books, discourses, and teachings into question.
(b) Dada K is questioning whether Guru's words are apta vakya - absolute knowledge. Herce Dada blatantly undermines Guru’ stature by saying that Baba makes mistakes due to His own negligence.
Such is the fatal flaw and sin that Dadaji has committed. All in all Dada K’s writing is nothing but his delirium. This clearly demonstrates that Dada K’s book is patently false and proves that Dada is not of the requisite standard to write a book on Guru or His teachings.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com
What happens when unqualified people interpret scriptures
Ananda Marga philosophy says, "The scriptures should always be interpreted by qualified scholars, competent philosophers, and penetrating thinkers. If one tries to interpret a profound scripture with superficial knowledge, the interpreter appears ridiculous and the audience is confused."
"There are some people who are neither scholars, nor philosophers, nor penetrating thinkers, but merely wander about interpreting scriptures as a means of livelihood. They utterly fail to present the proper matter in the correct perspective before the audience...[and] do more harm than good to the society..."
"[They] interpret the scriptures just to exhibit their intellect - to procure for themselves a certificate of erudition. They too remain far from the living spirit of the scriptures." (1)
This clearly demonstrates that Dada K’s book is patently false and proves that Dada is not of the requisite standard to write a book on Guru or His teachings.
Ananda Marga Caryacarya states, "The one formless, beginningless and infinite Parama Brahma (Supreme Consciousness) is the only entity to be attained by living beings – That alone is Jagat Guru (the Supreme preceptor), That alone has revealed Brahmavidyá (intuitional science) to us through the medium of the name and form of Anandamúrtijii. Unit beings must be made to appreciate Its majesty." (2)
Scan of that false story
Here is the scan of that bogus story:
References
1. Namah Shivaya Shantaya, Shiva's Teachings – 2 (continued) (Discourse 14)
2. Caryacarya, Part 2, Sadhana point #1a
* * *
The below sections are entirely different topics, unrelated to the above material.
They stand on their own as points of interest.
* * *
== Section 2: Important Teaching ==
Rampant libertines
Ananda Marga philosophy states, “The Sanskrit equivalent for marriage is viváha (vi – vah + ghaiṋ): it means, after the ceremony, the man and woman can no longer live as libertines or as irresponsible so-called family people. They have to discharge their full obligations as bharttá and kalatra, responsible husband and responsible wife.”
“Another Sanskrit equivalent for “woman” is nárii, which is feminine gender. But Shiva used the term kalatra, in the neuter; for to her husband a woman is a wife, but to her children and other members of the society, she is as dignified as her male counterpart. So by declaring a married lady to be kalatra, Shiva gave her special status, and addressed her in neuter terms.”
“The liberal meaning of the term viváha is “live one’s life in a new way with a special type of responsibility”. This is the underlying significance of the Shaeva system of marriage.”
Ananda Marga philosophy states, “In His life, Shiva Himself married with this commitment. We can say without the least hesitation that Shiva was the first person in this world to marry in the proper sense of the term..” (1)
Note: That which was common 7000 years ago has now again come into vogue: That same disease has become prevalent today. A huge percentage of people around the globe are leading libertine life - especially in the materialistic areas. They produce children and neglect to take any responsibility. They do not like to be bound in conjugal relations and shoulder the responsibility of helping the child. The ones who suffer the most are the children and the mother. Often such children wind up in foster care - mentally and physically scarred. It is a serious crisis - watch out. Where capitalism is growing that disease will spread. Our duty is to propagate this teaching - if we bring even one libertine onto the path of responsibility then at least to some small degree the problem is solved.
Reference
1. Namah Shivaya Shantaya, Disc: 9
== Section: Important Teaching ==
Back when Ananda Nagar was snow-covered
Ananda Marga philosophy says, “In the distant past, some areas of India did not exist: There was neither northern India, nor D’aba’k nor Samatat’ areas of Bengal, but there was Old Gondwana. That was about 300 million years ago. At that time, the major parts of Sind, the Punjab, U.P., Bihar and Bengal did not exist. They were all submerged under the vast oceans. The Himalayas also did not exist. But the Vindhya mountain range and its sister ranges, Sa’tpura’, Sahya’dri, Rajmahal and Ra’mga’r’h did exist. These mountains were very high, and always snow-covered.” (1)
Reference
1. A Few Problems Solved - 3, The History of Bengal – 1
== Section: Comment ==
[AUG 29 2017] Re: Bad & good news: current affairs
Namaskar,
They (so-called baba) don't have any spiritual philosophy nor any philosophical treatises (Darshan Shastra). They don’t have Socio-economic philosophy. No Social treatise. They don’t have any scientific spiritual meditation system. Simply they are doing business in the name of religion and Dharma. They are earning crores and stashing cash and gold in their rooms.
Whereas in order to realize GOD, money is not required. Even any very poor person can realise GOD by dint of sadhana without spending a single coin.
In HIM,
Devesh
- Here is a link to the initial letter on this topic - Bad & good news: current affairs
== Section ==
যদি জন্তু জানবরের ধ্যান করো
"তা, সৰ দেবতারই একটি না একটি বাহন আছে | তো, আজকালকার দেবতা হ’লে, jeep বাহন হত | কিন্তু, jeep jeep | হ্যাঁ | আর সে কালের দেবতা তো jeep বাহন নয় | এক-একটি জন্তু-জানবর | সুতরাং তুমি যদি জন্তু জানবরের ধ্যান করো---“যাদৃশী ভাবনা যস্য সিদ্ধির্ভবতি তাদৃশী |” যেমনটি ভাব নিয়েছ, তেমনটি গতি হৰে | কি বিপদের কথা ৰলো যে তুমি | তো, আরও বিপদের কথা মেয়েদের পক্ষে | মেয়েরা একটু সেজে-গুজে থাকতে ভালৰাসেন | তিনি যদি লক্ষ্মী পূজো করেন, লক্ষ্মীর বাহন প্যাঁচাটির মত দেখতে হয়ে যাবেন ।" (1)
Reference
1. 28-Apr-1979 AV
== Section 3: Links ==
Recent postings
Other topics of interest
